Seattle Public Library

Return to Neighborhood Branches page.
Return to
Montlake Branch

BUILDING A NEW MONTLAKE BRANCH
PRE-DESIGN HOPES & DREAMS MEETING RECAP

7 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. Monday, Sept. 23, 2002
Montlake Community Center, Tudor Building, 1618 E. Calhoun

Approximately 45 people from the community attended this meeting to discuss their vision for the new Montlake Branch of The Seattle Public Library. City Librarian Deborah L. Jacobs opened the meeting with welcoming comments and introductions of Gilbert W. Anderson, Library Board steward for the Montlake Branch; Miriam Driss, branch library manager for Montlake; Justine Kim, Library project manager for Montlake; and Val Frye, representing Neighborhood Library Services. During the course of the meeting, Jacobs also introduced Jane Appling, Library public services coordinator for neighborhood libraries; Lisa Richmond, public art project manager, Seattle Arts Commission; Ed Weinstein, architect for the new Montlake Branch; Tom Horne, Library selection services manager; Paula Herman, selection services librarian; and Ellen Judson and Suzanne Kotz, Citizen Implementation Review Panel members who also are Montlake residents.

Deborah Jacobs explained the intent of this pre-design meeting was for members of the community to share their desires and ideas for the Montlake Branch and meet the architects and staff involved in the project. The new 5,000-square-foot library will replace the current 1,574-square-foot branch.

Horne discussed expanding and identifying gaps in the already good collection at Montlake. Driss discussed plans for a meeting room to act as a gathering place for the community and as a location to hold library programs. Appling spoke briefly about expanding the library collection and technology, and developing the library's programs and services. Richmond spoke about Libraries for All's strong commitment to site-integrated public art, and explained that, as the design progresses, Library staff, designers and community members will convene to interview artists for the project. Jacobs spoke briefly about Capitol Hill Branch's new target opening in March 2003 and mentioned the construction work underway at the new Central Library.

Weinstein, who also is a Montlake resident, introduced the members of his team: Richard Yancey, project architect; Christiane Pein, staff architect; and Barbara Swift, landscape architect. He listed past Weinstein Copeland projects, stressed the team was committed to listening to community input and explained the firm's design process of fitting the building to the neighborhood and the site. He discussed design goals and noted that Montlake is made up of mostly single-family residences and a small commercial strip. He outlined the challenges presented by the site and discussed several possibilities for parking.

Jacobs described the meeting format and explained the meeting would break into four stations. She invited people to circulate around the room and offer their ideas. Additionally, the public asked questions of various staff members and architects:

Q. What is the size of the lot and the building? Could the library be on two levels?
A. The lot is 13,500 square feet, and the building will be 5,000 square feet. In general, with rare exceptions, the libraries are not designed on two levels, due to the need for increased staff.

Q. How are the number of parking spaces being determined?
A.
The land use code requires 10 to 13 parking stalls. Some negotiation may be possible, depending on the traffic management plan and the desires of the community.

Q. Parking at the University Branch on 50th and Roosevelt is on a slightly raised level - is that possible here?
A.
The parking at Montlake could be slightly above or slightly below level - all possible alternatives will be explored.

Q. Does the present parking plan include staff parking?
A
. In general, it is library policy not to provide staff parking, and to encourage staff members to use public transportation or park off-site.

Q. With an expanded library there'll be much greater usage, especially at night. Parking is particularly critical. How do you plan to address this?
A.
There is a possibility of discussing expanding street parking on 24th, if the community endorsed street parking on this block.

Q. Is it possible to hide the parking like at the Green Lake Branch?
A.
Yes, parking could be screened with latticework and vegetation. We have an obligation to screen parking from public view and make it attractive.

Q. It would be really helpful to have an open area for poetry, story telling and other programs.
A.
The relationship of the space to the activities is very important. The meeting room will greatly expand opportunities for programs and activities like these.

Q. Doesn't the city land use code require institutional dispersion?
A.
(NOTE: Institutional dispersion means maintaining a certain distance between institutions in neighborhoods. The question refers to the distance between the new Montlake Branch and the Montlake Elementary School.) We have looked into this issue. There is a specific clause for an exemption when there is a significant topographical break between two institutions, as there is in this case. We are very aware of this and have a lot of experience with conditional use agreements and exemptions, and the dispersion criteria. We will work with the City of Seattle to obtain approval through proper procedures.

The meeting then broke into four sessions on design, collections, services/programs, and art. Those sessions yielded the following comments from members of the public on their hopes and dreams for the new Montlake Branch:

Design

  • Calming traffic on 24th by adding parking is desirable
  • Maximize shelving space
  • Addressing the southeast corner is important at street level
  • Relocate bus stop northward? Incorporate bus shelter/seating near library entry
  • Focus on building a great library, not a parking lot
  • Place to park dogs safely, both for patrons & dogs; stroller parking area
  • Proper lighting - use of natural and artificial light
  • A way to easily see if library is open
  • Controlled exterior space (courtyard/outside reading area)
  • Secure parking
  • Separation/noise control between adult reading & children's areas
  • Do not build a parking lot
  • Park separating library & houses would be nice
  • Parking - the problem is the aggregate impact
  • Garage - close at night to limit neighborhood business use
  • Be careful with building mass and scale given scale of neighborhood development

Collections

  • Expand children's collection, especially nonfiction
  • Toddler videos
  • Shelve juvenile nonfiction separately, helps browsing
  • Plan for growth, aging of children
  • Books on tape - general and mid-list fiction
  • Books rather than computers
  • More magazines
  • More DVDs, more adult CDs: classical, jazz, ethnic
  • Expanded print reference
  • More videotapes, especially foreign films
  • Nonfiction DVDs, especially language learning
  • More books, especially traditional classics
  • Puzzles for children

Services/programs

  • Link programs such as poetry readings and author visits to activities that children study at school
  • Space for people to circulate, particularly around the computers
  • Don't duplicate programs offered at community center & elsewhere
  • Grow with families, from toddlers to teens
  • Keep young children away from the doors
  • Puppets, rocking chair, furniture scaled to kids
  • Quick pick-up of holds, online holds (self-check)
  • Meeting space for neighborhood groups
  • Able to get in and out of library quickly - helps with parking
  • Author programs, etc. for kids
  • A/V equipment, tack board, etc. in meeting room, dimmable lights
  • Free literature
  • Teen and adult discussion groups
  • Sunken preschool area
  • Demographics determine program
  • Support for home school families - collections, meeting space
  • Ongoing advisory board to provide input into branch services & programs
  • Dedicated children's librarian
  • Kid's programs on weekends (especially in winter)
  • Multicultural materials for adults & kids, reflect cultures in the community, thematic displays
  • Sound recordings, especially world culture & folksongs
  • Workshops on how to use library facilities & resources, genealogy
  • Training in use of library technology
  • Permanent files/space for Montlake Community Club
  • Ongoing art display opportunities for kids

Art

  • Site-integrated art, make good use of space
  • Functional art
  • Thematic design for art
  • Utilize botanical elements into art
  • Carnegie-style elements in art
  • Ceramic relief or brick carvings/brick relief
  • Incorporate children's art from Montlake grade school
  • Gallery space for local artists to show work
  • Monitoring, hanging, security issues
  • Art maintenance
  • Quality of work
  • Stylistic - less liable to look dated in a short time
  • Art that is true to place, true to community, tone
  • Incorporate history of the community; display historic photographs
  • Art that reflects local design, repeated shapes, type of stonework, scale of buildings - smaller, more intimate
  • Reflect local Tudor/Gothic motif
  • Strong community identity - echo those elements or historical elements
  • Landscape, greenscape so important to project
  • More landscaping - artists who work in landscape art or work with landscape architects as part of their process
  • Integration of landscape & art into one piece

Toward the end of the meeting, board steward Gilbert W. Anderson noted that work toward developing a library in Montlake has been going on for two years, and the next steps will be to work on design and show drawings to the public.

A member of the architectural team answered a question about the library's location next to residential, single-family houses, stressing the design should balance residential and commercial elements. In response to a question about the timing of reviewing design work, Richard Yancey said the timeline shows the end of schematic design around the end of the year

Jacobs thanked everyone for attending and told community members there would be ample opportunity to provide feedback and have input into design decisions. Jacobs noted that a recap of the meeting would be posted on the Library's Web site and would be available in hardcopy at the branch. The meeting ended at 8:30 p.m.

Comments can be directed to the capital program office at capital.program@spl.org, and to Justine Kim, Library project manager, at 615-1329 or by e-mail at justine.kim@spl.org.

Content Modified: Content Modified: 10 October 2002

08/11/2006

© 1999-2006 - The Seattle Public Library